Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

flux-jobs: should --include imply -A (all users) option #6585

Open
chu11 opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

flux-jobs: should --include imply -A (all users) option #6585

chu11 opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@chu11
Copy link
Member

chu11 commented Jan 28, 2025

Since --include is mostly about seeing who is running on what nodes, it should probably imply looking through all user's jobs.

This reminds me of this prior issue, just a subtle "what is the right approach to combos of options?" question

#5142

@grondo
Copy link
Contributor

grondo commented Jan 28, 2025

I agree -i, --include should imply -A (this even confused me recently), though as you note it can get a bit confusing and subtle. I was thinking maybe any filter-like option should imply -A, but that may be surprising with options like --name.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants