Do you have a plane to Change the name of API ?

[finscn]

@flyover , Hi ,
Do you have a plane to Change the name of API , then provide a JavaScript-friendly API ?

example:
box2d.b2BodyDef --> Box2d.bodyDef
world.CreateBody --> world.createBody
b2BodyType.b2_dynamicBody --> bodyType.dynamicBody
...

the things https://github.com/shakiba/planck.js do :

• b2 prefix is dropped from class names, for example b2World is now available as planck.World.
• Method names are converted from UpperCamelCase to lowerCamelCase.
• Definition classes/objects (BodyDef, FixtureDef, etc.) are replaced by inline JavaScript objects ({}).
• Shapes are made immutable and are not cloned when used to create fixtures.
• World#on(eventName, listenerFn) and World#off(eventName, listenerFn) are added to add and remove event listeners. Currently supported events are:
  • 'begin-contact'
  • 'end-contact'
  • 'pre-solve'
  • 'post-solve'
  • 'joint-removed'
  • 'fixture-removed'
  • `'body-removed'

[Nick-Riggs]

This lib is looking awesome and it's performance is very good.

👍 I would also like to see the naming conventions more along the lines of ECMAScript standards.

[Nek-]

Why?

On my side, I'm in favor of using Box2D standards. To improve code portability.

[alpertuna]

I also don't like the Box2D API naming BUT to benefit Box2D manual and tuts on internet, changing API may not be a good idea. Instead I have some wrapper classes on my project to use Box2D easily.
Btw thanks @flyover ! for preparing this ts version, so that I can find my way using autocompletions.

[flyover]

Yeah, I think I'm going to leave it as close to the original API as possible. Perhaps a wrapper that added some of these JS features would be nice, especially if the underlying physics engine could be swapped out.