You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Even if no other estimation sources are available, OctoPrint should only display the highly inaccurate linear estimate to the user if either 30min of the print have passed or 30% of the print job have been completed. In 1.2.15 the linear approximation is directly used instead of displaying "Calculating" until one of the above happens.
Solution
Make sure to actually convert passed time to minutes before comparison.
Already solved in 11bdc17, ticket created for documentation purposes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi
another thing that happend to me: I print a part twice, same gcode file. It could know (save) the time needed the first time of printing and then simply display that. Now it does recalculate it....
ah, that explains it then. When you delete the old file, OctoPrint also throws away the metadata. It can't know if you'll reupload the file again, and if it just expected you to do that, it would use a lot of space for obsolete metadata and slowly fill up your disk with garbage. So, deletion or reupload (which is a deletion + recreation) -> metadata is reset.
Problem
Even if no other estimation sources are available, OctoPrint should only display the highly inaccurate linear estimate to the user if either 30min of the print have passed or 30% of the print job have been completed. In 1.2.15 the linear approximation is directly used instead of displaying "Calculating" until one of the above happens.
Solution
Make sure to actually convert passed time to minutes before comparison.
Already solved in 11bdc17, ticket created for documentation purposes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: