Rename "testinstall" and "teststandard" to something more clear

[fingolfin]

For a new comer, it is not at all clear why "testinstall" is named the way it is. Yeah, we could explain... but I think it's much better to just use names that are easy to understand.

Some ideas for new names:

• fasttest and fulltest
• test-fast and test-full
• test-fast and test-all

The new names should be at least used for the make targets. For tst/testinstall, we could of course just rename that to the new name -- but it would also be possible to shorten that, e.g. tst/fast

One concern with that: it might be confusing if make test-full runs the tests from tst/full and tst/fast ... but I personally don't worry about that...

Any better ideas?

[fingolfin]

As @markuspf just pointed out to me, of course teststandard does not at all run all tests -- there are also the manual examples!

I think a test-all or test-full target really should run all tests. So, perhaps teststandard should just retain that name, or perhaps be changed to test, with siblings test-quick and test-all or so

[olexandr-konovalov]

And there are other test... targets, not only manual examples - e.g. testpackages, testobsoletes, testupdates etc., maybe testcoverage soon (like that idea).

So I am happy with teststandard to stay. Don't mind testinstall to became quicktest or so.

[hungaborhorvath]

I second that these names are far from self-explanatory. I have created 3 or 4 (quick) test files in the past month, and still am not entirely sure whether they should go to install or standard....

[frankluebeck]

However you want to rename the files: I would be nice if you kept testinstall.g at least as a soft link (even if undocumented) to the benefit of those gap users/administrators who read this file since many years as a quick test after installation.

[olexandr-konovalov]

Please see the new proposal for the naming conventions and structure of the test files written by @markuspf : https://github.com/gap-system/gap/wiki/Testing-methods-and-targets