Expose port 9997

[frgomes]

I'm a complete newbie on geomesa, so please pardon me for my language full of uncertainties and suppositions.

Background

I'm trying to run the accumulo tutorial which apparently needs port 9997.
In order to do that, apparently I have to expose port 9997 and rebuild the Docker image.
I had troubles building this image, mainly because bigtop repository version 1.1.0 apparently vanished.

About this ticket

This ticket is intended to tag the experiments I'm doing on the docker build process.
This is a list of modifications:

• expose port 9997
• parameterize BIGTOP_VERSION so that next time it becomes far easier;
• parameterize HADOOP_VERSION so that the same version is employed by all containers;
• automate the build of the tarball, so that the build is repeatable, not requiring the developer to build the tarball beforehand.

My changes are being done at:
https://github.com/frgomes/geodocker-geomesa/tree/0014-expose_port_9997

[frgomes]

Known issues

• build geodocker-geomesa-jupyter, which I've commented out for the time being, since it's failing at the moment;
• port 9997 is not exposed, apparently because accumulo is not running.

[elahrvivaz]

thanks for working on this - for 'automate the build of the tarball', it would be good to check to see if it already exists in the user's .m2 - I believe people use this to run custom builds of geomesa so they may want a particular working branch to get deployed

[frgomes]

@elahrvivaz

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/frgomes/geodocker-geomesa/0014-expose_port_9997/geodocker-accumulo-geomesa/Makefile

I suppose that this definition

BUILD_TARBALL := ${HOME}/.m2/repository/org/locationtech/geomesa/geomesa-accumulo-dist_2.11/${GEOMESA_VERSION}/geomesa-accumulo-dist_2.11-${GEOMESA_VERSION}-bin.tar.gz

and this dependency

${DIST_TARBALL}: ${BUILD_TARBALL}

.. they together guarantee that the tarball is only built if necessary, correct?

[elahrvivaz]

Ah, I'm not sure - isn't BUILD_TARBALL a prerequisite for DIST_TARBALL then? I feel like there is another check required

[frgomes]

@elahrvivaz : No worries. I will test what happens when the artifact is already there, and when it is not.