Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a web service instead connect database in SSH commands #1023

Closed
lunny opened this issue Feb 23, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Use a web service instead connect database in SSH commands #1023

lunny opened this issue Feb 23, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.

Comments

@lunny
Copy link
Member

lunny commented Feb 23, 2017

I proposed add a group URI in web command in "/internal/" sub URL. All other SSH sub commands should request the URL to do the operations but not read or write the database directly.
Especially when the database is sqlite and tidb, it's useful.

@lunny lunny added type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first. labels Feb 23, 2017
@lunny lunny added this to the 1.2.0 milestone Feb 23, 2017
@lunny lunny modified the milestones: 1.3.0, 1.2.0 Apr 28, 2017
@lunny lunny modified the milestones: 1.3.0, 1.x.x Oct 10, 2017
@lunny lunny removed this from the 1.x.x milestone Apr 21, 2019
@lunny
Copy link
Member Author

lunny commented Apr 21, 2019

This has been resolved.

@lunny lunny closed this as completed Apr 21, 2019
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 24, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
type/feature Completely new functionality. Can only be merged if feature freeze is not active. type/proposal The new feature has not been accepted yet but needs to be discussed first.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant