Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

a11y: rewrite td-headers-attr titles #9587

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 22, 2019
Merged

a11y: rewrite td-headers-attr titles #9587

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 22, 2019

Conversation

exterkamp
Copy link
Member

Summary
Translators were confused by these titles, and looking into it, they don't seem to make sense. This should be more accurate to the audit itself.

Deque Link

@exterkamp exterkamp changed the title a11y: rewrite td-header-attr titles a11y: rewrite td-headers-attr titles Aug 21, 2019
@exterkamp exterkamp requested a review from robdodson August 21, 2019 17:40
Copy link
Collaborator

@patrickhulce patrickhulce left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🙇the i18n 👑!!!

:)

Co-Authored-By: Patrick Hulce <[email protected]>
@paulirish
Copy link
Member

cc @kaycebasques

Copy link
Member

@brendankenny brendankenny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

thanks for decoding this one @exterkamp :)

Copy link
Member

@paulirish paulirish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TIL [headers] attribute.
TIL axe's docs on this audit are mostly about scope which the audit doesnt care about. dequelabs/axe-core#1782

our docs on it are also a bit confusing because it uses header but the example is seemingly incorrect not because it Week isn't an [id] in the table but because "one column has multiple table headers".

plus i bet this attribute doesn't get much use anyhow.

bleh.

@exterkamp exterkamp requested a review from kaycebasques August 21, 2019 19:14
@@ -276,10 +276,10 @@
"message": "Screen readers have features to make navigating tables easier. Ensuring `<td>` cells using the `[headers]` attribute only refer to other cells in the same table may improve the experience for screen reader users. [Learn more](https://web.dev/td-headers-attr/)."
},
"lighthouse-core/audits/accessibility/td-headers-attr.js | failureTitle": {
"message": "Cells in a `<table>` element that use the `[headers]` attribute do not refer to headers of the same table."
"message": "Cells in a `<table>` element that use the `[headers]` attribute refer to element `id`s not found within the same table."
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@exterkamp is the plurliazation of a placeholder not a problem then? I noticed you did it in #9590 too

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't be, it's only a problem when we have a variable amount of things. If we passed in a variable like idCount and needed a variable amount of ids then it would be a problem.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't be, it's only a problem when we have a variable amount of things. If we passed in a variable like idCount and needed a variable amount of ids then it would be a problem.

but is there a single character (or equivalent characters) in other languages that means "make the attached word plural"?

Seems better to reword, even if it gets into plural awkwardness (and even better if we can reword to avoid the awkwardness) "refer to an element id not found within the same table" or whatever

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gotcha. Done!

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ya brendan much better worded my concern :) 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants