-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
script:contains() doesn't seem to handle script/rocketscript
script tags?
#2354
Comments
Are you on Vivaldi ? If so, inline-script tag filtering will not work. That's a feature only working on Firefox and its derivatives. |
however, use |
On firefox. Disabling generichide didn't work. |
add
|
Above solution didn't work either. |
|
the generichide (or elemhide) filter is working fine (tested in firefox / chrome + ubo / ABP) |
Wow, I fail at reporting.
I fail at reading the documentation as well, apparently. That explains it. Is there a timeline for getting this in non-firefox browsers? |
read
|
My solution works fine on Chromium, I haven't tested on Firefox, as I don't use Firefox, but it should. Update all your uBlock filters, and uBlock resources.
Never. Read - whatwg/html#943 |
@uBlock-user - Yeah, reading that thread and feeling raeg at the moment. I love all the "people should use <other thing that's not even specified yet>" responses. |
@fake-name FYI, It might get removed from Firefox too - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1286822 |
It's fine if they remove it, as long as a replacement is implemented first. I'd assume they're going to remove it, and then never bother implementing any replacement, though. |
There won't be any replacement neither any plans, they're following in the steps of what Google and others decided. |
|
Duplicate of #2015. |
Describe the issue
I'm trying to block some of the particularly spectacularly obnoxious ads, using the
script:contains()
command, and it seems to not be working?One or more specific URLs where the issue occurs
https//www.nepustation.com/
Probably others. This is largely a function of blockadblock.com's functionality.
Steps for anyone to reproduce the issue
I've created the following custom filters:
I'd expect this to block the blockadblock script, but it doesn't seem to work.
Either I'm misunderstanding how the
script:contains()
command works (the fact that it doesn't require "" around the script string makes me suspect I'm doing something wrong), or I don't know what's going on.Your settings
Your filter lists
Defaults
Your custom filters (if any)
See above.
There's also some fun other bullshit here: The site uses a custom font with reordered codepoints to "protect" it's content from copy+paste (and break screen-readers, reading mode, and basically kill kittens for every refresh too).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: