You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for maintaining this package, it is much appreciated.
It may be a good feature to add matching based on partial expectations. An example is when there is an item gets put into a DynamoDB table with a timestamp, which timestamp is inaccessible from the tests given that it is part of the function one wants to test.
If there was a possibility to do partial matching besides the currently existing deep equality check in the PutItem function, one could handle the above use-case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @gusaul ,
Thank you for maintaining this package, it is much appreciated.
It may be a good feature to add matching based on partial expectations. An example is when there is an item gets put into a DynamoDB table with a timestamp, which timestamp is inaccessible from the tests given that it is part of the function one wants to test.
If there was a possibility to do partial matching besides the currently existing deep equality check in the PutItem function, one could handle the above use-case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: