-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Resolve the HAFS v1.0 compile warnings #234
Comments
build_forecast.log (741)
build_post.log(3)
build_tracker.log(1)
build_utils.log(4)
build_tools.log(1)
build_gsi.log(17)
build_hycom_utils.log(0)build_ww3_utils.log(0) |
With the great collaborative work and support from the ufs-weather-model and its subcomponents developers, together with the EMC hurricane, wave, post, and data assimilation groups' effort, the build warnings have been significantly reduced (almost eliminated) for the latest HAFSv2 package. The total number of build warnings is reduced from 399 (HAFSv1) to 34 (HAFSv2). Besides, most of the remaining build warning are related to this item of "libjasper.so, may conflict with libjpeg.so.9", which cannot be addressed from the HAFS developers' end. Here are the left over build warning items for the entire HAFSv2 package:
|
Related issue and PRs to address the ufs-weather-model build warnings can be seen from ufs-community/ufs-weather-model/issues/1984 and ufs-community/ufs-weather-model/pull/2218. |
Description
Provide a clear and concise description of the requested feature/capability.
From NCO SPA:
There are numerous compilation warnings in the HAFS v1.0 builds, shown as below for some samples. Please ensure that these can be compiled cleanly in the next upgrade.
All compilation warning are listed in /lfs/h1/ops/para/packages/hafs.v1.0.3/sorc/logs/warning.list file and here the statists from each sorc builds -
build_forecast.log 363
build_gsi.log 17
build_hycom_utils.log 9
build_post.log 2
build_tools.log 1
build_tracker.log 3
build_utils.log 4
build_ww3_utils.log 0
total 399
Proposed solution
How should the new feature/capability be added? If you have thoughts on the implementation strategy, please share them here.
Status (optional)
Do you (or a colleague) plan to work on adding this feature?
Related to (optional)
Directly reference any related issues or PRs in this or other repositories, and describe how they are related. Examples:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: