Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Direct calling of node stop and start commands #636

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

Ivo-Yankov
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes the way flags are being passed in the declaration of the solo node start and solo node stop commands.

Related Issues

@Ivo-Yankov Ivo-Yankov self-assigned this Oct 2, 2024
@Ivo-Yankov Ivo-Yankov added the Bug A error that causes the feature to behave differently than what was expected based on design docs label Oct 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Unit Test Results - Linux

  1 files  ±0   19 suites  ±0   26s ⏱️ -2s
119 tests ±0  119 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
145 runs  ±0  145 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit d4afe5a. ± Comparison against base commit efa1783.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Unit Test Results - Windows

  1 files  ±0   19 suites  ±0   54s ⏱️ ±0s
119 tests ±0  119 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
145 runs  ±0  145 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit d4afe5a. ± Comparison against base commit efa1783.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

E2E Test Report

0 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit d4afe5a. ± Comparison against base commit efa1783.

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 2, 2024

E2E Test Report

0 tests  ±0   0 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
0 suites ±0   0 💤 ±0 
0 files   ±0   0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit d4afe5a. ± Comparison against base commit efa1783.

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.02% (target: -1.00%) 0.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (efa1783) 4171 3354 80.41%
Head commit (d4afe5a) 4175 (+4) 3358 (+4) 80.43% (+0.02%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#636) 2 0 0.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 80.26%. Comparing base (efa1783) to head (d4afe5a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/commands/node.mjs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #636   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.26%   80.26%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        5012     5012           
  Branches      767      691   -76     
=======================================
  Hits         4023     4023           
  Misses        988      988           
  Partials        1        1           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/commands/node.mjs 77.95% <0.00%> (ø)

Impacted file tree graph

@Ivo-Yankov Ivo-Yankov marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2024 10:42
@Ivo-Yankov Ivo-Yankov requested review from leninmehedy and a team as code owners October 2, 2024 10:42
@Ivo-Yankov Ivo-Yankov merged commit 7749b04 into main Oct 2, 2024
34 of 35 checks passed
@Ivo-Yankov Ivo-Yankov deleted the 00635-error-when-calling-solo-node-startstop branch October 2, 2024 13:16
swirlds-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
## [0.31.0](v0.30.1...v0.31.0) (2024-10-04)

### Features

* Add '--mirror-node-version' flag to override default mirror node version ([#616](#616)) ([e4932c4](e4932c4))
* add quiet flag ([#621](#621)) ([b068c8f](b068c8f))
* convert hugo docs workflow calls to use Taskfile task ([#642](#642)) ([ae8d8bb](ae8d8bb))
* ensured user-provided values file takes precedence over solo-generated values ([#615](#615)) ([1b0ffc9](1b0ffc9))
* **logging:** Add the new custom process output class and inject it into the default list renderer options ([#622](#622)) ([efa1783](efa1783))
* separate commands for solo node delete ([#597](#597)) ([b251276](b251276))
* Separate network upgrade and freeze from node update/add/delete command ([#628](#628)) ([9b17937](9b17937))

### Bug Fixes

* Direct calling of node stop and start commands ([#636](#636)) ([7749b04](7749b04))
* **docs:** resolve issues due to npx in taskfile for the custom-network-config example ([038e6df](038e6df))
* jsdoc failed but ci job not failed ([#608](#608)) ([3f838f6](3f838f6))
* specify jvm env variables explicitly for local profile ([#405](#405)) ([3db7e08](3db7e08))
* **tests:** start Kind cluster on demand if not having a kube config errors ([#624](#624)) ([538e40d](538e40d))
* upgrade eslint config away from abandoned plugin ([#643](#643)) ([84d3dc5](84d3dc5))
@swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.31.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug A error that causes the feature to behave differently than what was expected based on design docs released
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Error when calling solo node start/stop
3 participants