First: if you're unsure or afraid of anything, just ask or submit the issue describing the problem you're aiming to solve.
Any bug fix and feature has to be considered in the context of many (100+) providers and the wider Terraform ecosystem. This is great as your contribution can have a big positive impact, but we have to assess potential negative impact too (e.g. breaking existing providers which may not use a new feature).
Note: We use GitHub for tracking bugs and feature requests related to this project's functionality.
For questions, please see relevant channels at https://www.terraform.io/community.html
Please disclose security vulnerabilities responsibly by following the procedure described at https://www.hashicorp.com/security#vulnerability-reporting
We welcome issues of all kinds including feature requests, bug reports or documentation suggestions. Below are guidelines for well-formed issues of each type.
-
Test against latest release: Make sure you test against the latest avaiable version of both Terraform and terraform-plugin-framework. It is possible we already fixed the bug you're experiencing.
-
Search for duplicates: It's helpful to keep bug reports consolidated to one thread, so do a quick search on existing bug reports to check if anybody else has reported the same thing. You can scope searches by the label
bug
to help narrow things down. -
Include steps to reproduce: Provide steps to reproduce the issue, along with code examples (both HCL and Go, where applicable) and/or real code, so we can try to reproduce it. Without this, it makes it much harder (sometimes impossible) to fix the issue.
-
Consider adding an integration test case: A demo provider, terraform-provider-corner, is available as an easy test bed for reproducing bugs in provider code. Consider opening a PR to terraform-provider-corner demonstrating the bug. Please see Integration tests below for how to do this.
-
Search for possible duplicate requests: It's helpful to keep requests consolidated to one thread, so do a quick search on existing requests to check if anybody else has reported the same thing. You can scope searches by the label
enhancement
to help narrow things down. -
Include a use case description: In addition to describing the behavior of the feature you'd like to see added, it's helpful to also lay out the reason why the feature would be important and how it would benefit the wider Terraform ecosystem. Use case in context of 1 provider is good, wider context of more providers is better.
Thank you for contributing!
We are happy to review pull requests without associated issues, but we highly recommend starting by describing and discussing your problem or feature and attaching use cases to an issue first before raising a pull request.
-
Early validation of idea and implementation plan: terraform-plugin-framework is complicated enough that there are often several ways to implement something, each of which has different implications and tradeoffs. Working through a plan of attack with the team before you dive into implementation will help ensure that you're working in the right direction.
-
Unit and Integration Tests: It may go without saying, but every new patch should be covered by tests wherever possible (see Testing below).
-
Go Modules: We use Go Modules to manage and version all our dependencies. Please make sure that you reflect dependency changes in your pull requests appropriately (e.g.
go get
,go mod tidy
or other commands). Refer to the dependency updates section for more information about how this project maintains existing dependencies. -
Changelog: Refer to the changelog section for more information about how to create changelog entries.
-
License Headers: All source code requires a license header at the top of the file, refer to License Headers for information on how to autogenerate these headers.
In general we do not accept PRs containing only the following changes:
- Correcting spelling or typos
- Code formatting, including whitespace
- Other cosmetic changes that do not affect functionality
While we appreciate the effort that goes into preparing PRs, there is always a tradeoff between benefit and cost. The costs involved in accepting such contributions include the time taken for thorough review, the noise created in the git history, and the increased number of GitHub notifications that maintainers must attend to.
We belive that one should "leave the campsite cleaner than you found it", so you are welcome to clean up cosmetic issues in the neighbourhood when submitting a patch that makes functional changes or fixes.
Dependency management is performed by dependabot. Where possible, dependency updates should occur through that system to ensure all Go module files are appropriately updated and to prevent duplicated effort of concurrent update submissions. Once available, updates are expected to be verified and merged to prevent latent technical debt.
HashiCorp’s open-source projects have always maintained user-friendly, readable CHANGELOGs that allow practitioners and developers to tell at a glance whether a release should have any effect on them, and to gauge the risk of an upgrade.
We follow Terraform Plugin changelog specifications.
This project uses the Changie automation tool for changelog automation.
To add a new entry to the CHANGELOG
, install Changie using the following instructions
After Changie is installed on your local machine, run:
changie new
and choose a kind
of change corresponding to the Terraform Plugin changelog categories
Fill out the body field following the entry format. Changie will then prompt for a Github issue or pull request number.
Repeat this process for any additional changes. The .yaml
files created in the .changes/unreleased
folder
should be pushed the repository along with any code changes.
The CHANGELOG is intended to show developer-impacting changes to the codebase for a particular version. If every change or commit to the code resulted in an entry, the CHANGELOG would become less useful for developers. The lists below are general guidelines and examples for when a decision needs to be made to decide whether a change should have an entry.
- Documentation updates
- Testing updates
- Code refactoring
- Dependency updates: If the update contains relevant bug fixes or enhancements that affect developers, those should be called out.
A major feature entry should use the FEATURES
kind.
Added `great` package, which solves all the problems
A new bug entry should use the BUG FIXES
kind and have a prefix indicating the sub-package it corresponds to, a colon, then followed by a brief summary. Use a all
prefix should the fix apply to all sub-packages.
tfsdk: Prevented potential panic in `Example()` function
A new enhancement entry should use the ENHANCEMENTS
kind and have a prefix indicating the sub-package it corresponds to, a colon, then followed by a brief summary. Use a all
prefix for enchancements that apply to all sub-packages.
attr: Added `Great` interface for doing great things
A deprecation entry should use the NOTES
kind and have a prefix indicating the sub-package it corresponds to, a colon, then followed by a brief summary. Use a all
prefix for changes that apply to all sub-packages.
diag: The `Old()` function is being deprecated in favor of the `New()` function
A breaking-change entry should use the BREAKING CHANGES
kind and have a prefix indicating the sub-package it corresponds to, a colon, then followed by a brief summary. Use a all
prefix for changes that apply to all sub-packages.
tfsdk: The `Example` type `Old` field has been removed since it is not necessary
All source code files (excluding autogenerated files like go.mod
, prose, and files excluded in .copywrite.hcl) must have a license header at the top.
This can be autogenerated by running make generate
or running go generate ./...
in the /tools directory.
GitHub Actions workflow bug and style checking is performed via actionlint
.
To run the GitHub Actions linters locally, install the actionlint
tool, and run:
actionlint
Go code bug and style checking is performed via golangci-lint
.
To run the Go linters locally, install the golangci-lint
tool, and run:
golangci-lint run ./...
Code contributions should be supported by both unit and integration tests wherever possible.
GitHub Actions workflow testing is performed via act
.
To run the GitHub Actions testing locally (setting appropriate event):
act --artifact-server-path /tmp --env ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN=test -P ubuntu-latest=ghcr.io/catthehacker/ubuntu:act-latest pull_request
The command options can be added to a ~/.actrc
file:
--artifact-server-path /tmp
--env ACTIONS_RUNTIME_TOKEN=test
-P ubuntu-latest=ghcr.io/catthehacker/ubuntu:act-latest
So they do not need to be specified every invocation:
act pull_request
To test the ci-go/terraform-provider-corner
job, a valid GitHub Personal Access Token (PAT) with public read permissions is required. It can be passed in via the -s GITHUB_TOKEN=...
command option.
Go code unit testing is perfomed via Go's built-in testing functionality.
To run the Go unit testing locally:
go test ./...
This codebase follows Go conventions for unit testing. Some guidelines include:
- File Naming: Test files should be named
*_test.go
and usually reside in the same package as the code being tested. - Test Naming: Test functions must include the
Test
prefix and should be named after the function or method under test. AnExample()
function test should be namedTestExample
. AData
typeExample()
method test should be namedTestDataExample
. - Concurrency: Where possible, unit tests should be able to run concurrently and include a call to
t.Parallel()
. Usage of mutable shared data, such as environment variables or global variables that are used with reads and writes, is strongly discouraged. - Table Driven: Where possible, unit tests should be written using the table driven testing style.
- go-cmp: Where possible, comparison testing should be done via
go-cmp
. In particular, thecmp.Diff()
andcmp.Equal()
functions are helpful.
A common template for implementing unit tests is:
func TestExample(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
testCases := map[string]struct{
// fields to store inputs and expectations
}{
"test-description": {
// fields from above
},
}
for name, testCase := range testCases {
// Do not omit this next line
name, testCase := name, testCase
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Implement test referencing testCase fields
})
}
}
We use a special "corner case" Terraform provider for integration testing of terraform-plugin-framework, called terraform-provider-corner.
Integration testing for terraform-plugin-framework involves compiling this provider against the version of the framework to be tested, and running the provider's acceptance tests. The "provider-corner integration test"
CI job does this automatically for each PR commit and each commit to main
. This ensures that changes to terraform-plugin-framework do not cause regressions.
The terraform-provider-corner repo contains several provider servers (which are combined in order to test terraform-plugin-mux) to test different versions of the Terraform Plugin SDK and Framework.
To add a test case for terraform-plugin-framework, add or modify resource code as appropriate in the frameworkprovider
. Then, create an acceptance test for the desired behaviour.
Creating a test case in terraform-provider-corner is a very helpful way to illustrate your bug report or feature request with easily reproducible provider code. We welcome PRs to terraform-provider-corner that demonstrate bugs and edge cases.
When fixing a bug or adding a new feature to the framework, it is helpful to create a test case in real provider code. Since the test will fail until your change is included in a terraform-plugin-framework release used by terraform-provider-corner, we recommend doing the following:
- Fork and clone the terraform-plugin-framework and terraform-provider-corner repositories to your local machine. Identify the bug you want to fix or the feature you want to add to terraform-plugin-framework.
- On your local fork of terraform-provider-corner, create a failing acceptance test demonstrating this behaviour. The test should be named
TestAccFramework*
. - Add a
replace
directive to thego.mod
file in your local terraform-provider-corner, pointing to your local fork of terraform-plugin-framework. - Make the desired code change on your local fork of terraform-plugin-framework. Don't forget unit tests as well!
- Verify that the acceptance test now passes.
- Make a PR to terraform-plugin-framework proposing the code change.
- Make a PR to terraform-provider-corner adding the new acceptance test and noting that it depends on the PR to terraform-plugin-framework.
Maintainers will ensure that the acceptance test is merged into terraform-provider-corner once the terraform-plugin-framework change is merged and released.
This section is dedicated to the maintainers of this project.
To cut a release, go to the repository in Github and click on the Actions
tab.
Select the Release
workflow on the left-hand menu.
Click on the Run workflow
button.
Select the branch to cut the release from (default is main).
Input the Release version number
which is the Semantic Release number including
the v
prefix (i.e. v1.4.0
) and click Run workflow
to kickoff the release.