Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Terraform aws provider is not supporting dynamodb table with customer managed key , Aws added --sse-specification Enabled=true,SSEType=KMS,KMSMasterKeyId=KMSKEYID #11234

Closed
vptayde opened this issue Dec 11, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope.

Comments

@vptayde
Copy link

vptayde commented Dec 11, 2019

For Dynamodb table Aws is supporting Encryption at Rest and introduced field as KMS - Customer managed CMK
But terraform only have enable field present for KMS.
server_side_encryption {
enabled = true
}
AWS cli command with KMS : --sse-specification Enabled=true,SSEType=KMS,KMSMasterKeyId=KMSKEYID

When terraform will support Customer managed CMK
Need support in terraform provider for attribute SSEType=KMS,KMSMasterKeyId=KMSKEYID

@vptayde vptayde added the enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. label Dec 11, 2019
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. label Dec 11, 2019
@vptayde vptayde changed the title Terraform aws provoder is not supporting dynamodb table with customer managed key Terraform aws provider is not supporting dynamodb table with customer managed key , Aws added --sse-specification Enabled=true,SSEType=KMS,KMSMasterKeyId=KMSKEYID Dec 11, 2019
@ewbankkit
Copy link
Contributor

@vptayde Thanks for this. This issue was also raised a while ago in #8137 and is implemented via #11081 (which I now see needs a rebase and merge conflict resolution).

@bflad
Copy link
Contributor

bflad commented Dec 11, 2019

Closing this issue to consolidate discussions and efforts with the previous #8137 and #11081. 👍

@bflad bflad closed this as completed Dec 11, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 28, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 28, 2020
@breathingdust breathingdust removed the needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. label Sep 17, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants