-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for High Churn on Azure Seite Recovery replicated VM #23343
Comments
@viewegchris Thank you for taking the time to open this feature request! |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Hello there, working on a new module to implement this, do you have any news about it? |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
I'll be working on this issue. For the record, I believe this is the location in Azure's API docs that describe the property in question: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/site-recovery/replication-protected-items/repair-replication?view=rest-site-recovery-2024-10-01&tabs=HTTP#churnoptionselected |
After extensive investigation and experimenting, I've been unable find a way to manage ChurnOption via the Azure API. I opened an issue on the Azure API Spec repo: Azure/azure-rest-api-specs#32027 |
According to the Microsoft Azure support representative, the churn option will be made available in both the GET and CREATE endpoints for replication protected items in a future version of the Azure API. |
According to MS rep:
|
Is there an existing issue for this?
Community Note
Description
Azure added support for High Churn replication on Azure Site Recovery Vault. This allows to replicate VMs with high data rates as well. The new feature requires the use of
Premium_LRS
Storage Accounts.New or Affected Resource(s)/Data Source(s)
azurerm_site_recovery_replicated_vm
Potential Terraform Configuration
References
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/site-recovery/concepts-azure-to-azure-high-churn-support
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: