Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

provider/aws: aws_route53_record alias refresh manually updated record #9125

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 3, 2016

Conversation

stack72
Copy link
Contributor

@stack72 stack72 commented Sep 29, 2016

Fixes #9108

When an aws_route53_record alias is created with terraform and then
modified via cli or console, terraform wasn't picking up the changes. I
had the following config:

resource "aws_route53_record" "alias" {
  zone_id = "${aws_route53_zone.main.zone_id}"
  name = "www"
  type = "A"

  alias {
    zone_id = "${aws_elb.main.zone_id}"
    name = "${aws_elb.main.dns_name}"
    evaluate_target_health = true
  }
}

I changed the evaluate_health_target on the AWS console and terraform plan showed me this:

% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.

aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)

No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date. This means that Terraform
could not detect any differences between your configuration and
the real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform
doesn't need to do anything.

When rebuilding the provider with the changes in the PR, a terraform plan then looks as follows:

% terraform plan
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
  If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
  See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-azurerm overrides an internal plugin for azurerm-provider.
  If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
  See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.

aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)

The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.

Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.

~ aws_route53_record.alias
    alias.1050468691.evaluate_target_health: "" => "true"
    alias.1050468691.name:                   "" => "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com"
    alias.1050468691.zone_id:                "" => "Z1H1FL5HABSF5"
    alias.2906616344.evaluate_target_health: "false" => "false"
    alias.2906616344.name:                   "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com." => ""
    alias.2906616344.zone_id:                "Z1H1FL5HABSF5" => ""

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.

the apply then changed the target back to true

Fixes #9108

When an aws_route53_record alias is created with terraform and then
modified via cli or console, terraform wasn't picking up the changes. I
had the following config:

```
resource "aws_route53_record" "alias" {
  zone_id = "${aws_route53_zone.main.zone_id}"
  name = "www"
  type = "A"

  alias {
  	zone_id = "${aws_elb.main.zone_id}"
  	name = "${aws_elb.main.dns_name}"
  	evaluate_target_health = true
  }
}
```

I changed the evaluate_health_target on the AWS console and terraform plan showed me this:

```
% terraform plan
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.

aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)

No changes. Infrastructure is up-to-date. This means that Terraform
could not detect any differences between your configuration and
the real physical resources that exist. As a result, Terraform
doesn't need to do anything.
```

When rebuilding the provider with the changes in the PR, a terraform plan then looks as follows:

```
% terraform plan
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-aws overrides an internal plugin for aws-provider.
  If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
  See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
[WARN] /Users/stacko/Code/go/bin/terraform-provider-azurerm overrides an internal plugin for azurerm-provider.
  If you did not expect to see this message you will need to remove the old plugin.
  See https://www.terraform.io/docs/internals/internal-plugins.html
Refreshing Terraform state in-memory prior to plan...
The refreshed state will be used to calculate this plan, but
will not be persisted to local or remote state storage.

aws_route53_zone.main: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X)
aws_elb.main: Refreshing state... (ID: foobar-terraform-elb-1111)
aws_route53_record.alias: Refreshing state... (ID: Z32Z9B1UPAIP6X_www_A)

The Terraform execution plan has been generated and is shown below.
Resources are shown in alphabetical order for quick scanning. Green resources
will be created (or destroyed and then created if an existing resource
exists), yellow resources are being changed in-place, and red resources
will be destroyed. Cyan entries are data sources to be read.

Note: You didn't specify an "-out" parameter to save this plan, so when
"apply" is called, Terraform can't guarantee this is what will execute.

~ aws_route53_record.alias
    alias.1050468691.evaluate_target_health: "" => "true"
    alias.1050468691.name:                   "" => "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com"
    alias.1050468691.zone_id:                "" => "Z1H1FL5HABSF5"
    alias.2906616344.evaluate_target_health: "false" => "false"
    alias.2906616344.name:                   "foobar-terraform-elb-1111-522021794.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com." => ""
    alias.2906616344.zone_id:                "Z1H1FL5HABSF5" => ""

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.
```

the apply then changed the target back to true

```
% make testacc TEST=./builtin/providers/aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
go generate $(go list ./... | grep -v /terraform/vendor/)
2016/09/29 18:17:23 Generated command/internal_plugin_list.go
TF_ACC=1 go test ./builtin/providers/aws -v
-run=TestAccAWSRoute53Record_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic (120.63s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn (131.81s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport (128.40s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport (120.06s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix (114.02s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard (165.54s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover (118.10s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic (128.10s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_alias (132.62s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_s3_alias (132.12s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias (237.92s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic (121.95s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic (123.40s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange (198.24s)
=== RUN   TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty
--- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty (119.68s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws2092.597s
```
Copy link
Contributor

@catsby catsby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@stack72 stack72 merged commit 7cba889 into master Oct 3, 2016
@stack72 stack72 deleted the b-aws-r53-alias-refresh branch October 3, 2016 14:55
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 21, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 21, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

aws_route53_record doesn't refresh state with external changes to alias
2 participants