Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Err: insufficient funds for gas #96

Closed
nftkk opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Err: insufficient funds for gas #96

nftkk opened this issue Mar 8, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@nftkk
Copy link

nftkk commented Mar 8, 2022

Hey Guys
i did everything successfull. i just want to test if minting an nft works also. so i put an different wallet to the whitelist and try to mint. the price was 100 matic for one nft. i connect the wallet with meta mask and try to mint but get error on the dapp.

Err: insufficient funds for gas * price + value: address WALLETADRESS..................... have 95297622973218834522 want 100000000000000000000 (supplied gas 14995852)

dont give attention to the 2 minted one they are minted by the blockchain to owner.

image

@liarco
Copy link
Member

liarco commented Mar 8, 2022

Hi @nftkk, which version are you using?

@liarco liarco added the feedback requested To be closed if no feedback is received label Mar 8, 2022
@nftkk
Copy link
Author

nftkk commented Mar 8, 2022

i download it by the github link yesterday. it was the 2.0.0

@liarco
Copy link
Member

liarco commented Mar 8, 2022

I'm sorry but Polygon is still not officially supported here, unexpected behavior can happen if you force it manually. We are working in order to include it in the next release (check #57) but it's still not ready for production, so you can test it at your own risk.

@liarco liarco closed this as completed Mar 8, 2022
@liarco liarco removed the feedback requested To be closed if no feedback is received label Mar 8, 2022
@liarco
Copy link
Member

liarco commented Mar 8, 2022

Sorry, just forgot to say that you can try the code from the PR mentioned above and give feedback on the PR itself so we complete the implementation thank to feedback from users like you. But I must close this because this is not actually an "issue" with any of the stable versions, we can't expect this to work properly with any possible chain at the moment. 😉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants