Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove the nixpkgs module #41

Open
roberth opened this issue Jun 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Remove the nixpkgs module #41

roberth opened this issue Jun 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
requires upstream change Issues that need a change in Nix, Nixpkgs, etc

Comments

@roberth
Copy link
Member

roberth commented Jun 18, 2022

It violates the architecture and should be replaced by a NixOS/nixpkgs default flakeModule.
@roberth
Copy link
Member Author

roberth commented Jun 18, 2022

Arguably the nixos* options should move there as well, although those have the bad excuse of nix flake check comitting the same layering violation.

@roberth roberth mentioned this issue Jun 18, 2022
Closed
@zimbatm
Copy link
Contributor

zimbatm commented Jun 19, 2022

It depends where you set the needle between convenience and purity. All the flake-parts users would most likely end up re-adding it. Nixpkgs has a special place in the ecosystem and is a dependency of flake-parts itself.

@roberth roberth mentioned this issue Nov 15, 2022
Open
@roberth roberth added the requires upstream change Issues that need a change in Nix, Nixpkgs, etc label Feb 1, 2023
@szlend szlend mentioned this issue Feb 10, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
requires upstream change Issues that need a change in Nix, Nixpkgs, etc
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@zimbatm @roberth