You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
TE: is currently defined in the HTTP/1.1 encoding. However, the definition is used by HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 to say that it MAY be present, but MUST NOT have any value other than trailers. It's a little strange, since this is definitely an artifact of wire encoding, but is used quasi-consistently across HTTP encodings.
Does this belong in Semantics?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it does. In fact, I've been thinking of moving all of the header fields to Semantics for their definition (not necessarily their associated requirements) and simply noting when a field is not allowed (or translated) in h2, etc.
TE: is currently defined in the HTTP/1.1 encoding. However, the definition is used by HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 to say that it MAY be present, but MUST NOT have any value other than
trailers
. It's a little strange, since this is definitely an artifact of wire encoding, but is used quasi-consistently across HTTP encodings.Does this belong in Semantics?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: