You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the paper, the update in G steps is according to formula 4, in which generative probability is defined by the product of several probability along the way from node v_c to node v. However, in the program, it only considers the nodes in the window to update generator. I am wandering whether this approximation is plausible?
If only using the sampled node without using the path over it, the efficiency would be quite low.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your question. Here the implementation is inspired by word2vec, in which the inner product of a pair of words within a window is optimized. If we directly optimize the relevance probability, the inner product terms in the denominator will be likely to decrease, which is not what we want since they are also ground truth edges in the graph.
In the paper, the update in G steps is according to formula 4, in which generative probability is defined by the product of several probability along the way from node v_c to node v. However, in the program, it only considers the nodes in the window to update generator. I am wandering whether this approximation is plausible?
If only using the sampled node without using the path over it, the efficiency would be quite low.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: