Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Unable to reproduce Cifar-10 results for WRN-28-10 #32

Open
humza909 opened this issue Nov 4, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Unable to reproduce Cifar-10 results for WRN-28-10 #32

humza909 opened this issue Nov 4, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@humza909
Copy link

humza909 commented Nov 4, 2022

Hi,

I am unable to reproduce cifar-10 results for the model WRN-28-10. The accuracy I get stays as low as 96.7% but the reported accuracy is 97.4% (this repo) / 97.3% (in paper). Anyone else facing similar issues? @ildoonet Is your reported accuracy the average of multiple runs or only for a single run?

I am using the following command:

python RandAugment/train.py -c confs/wresnet28x10_cifar10_b256.yaml

Thanks
@dahuaxiya
Copy link

I get 96.7% test accuracy too after 200 epochs. Do you know why now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@humza909 @dahuaxiya