-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement SNMP traps version 3 #6918
Comments
@nasras03 Could you help me understand your use case a little better? SNMP v3 added a few different types of security and I'm not sure which one you're referring to. I'm guessing you mean USM (RFC 2574) but there's also TSM. If it's USM there are a few options for authentication type (like MD5 and SHA) and privacy protocol (like DES and AES). Which do your devices use? Also, do you only need secure trap support or also inform? |
Hey @nasras03! Do you think you could answer the questions above? We would like to get a clearer understanding of specifics for your use case. |
|
Could SNMP trap inform be part of the next development cycle as well. We have some devices using inform to see if their trap is received. They will now retry and sent the inform message multiple times as no repsonse is given and the message is dropped by Telegraf. We run telegraf is a docker setup the latest release from docker hub "Telegraf 1.13.2". 07:49:44.829779 IP nlrott99-gm5120.testlab.net.43613 > rott99-app2002.snmptrap: C="xxxxxxxx" V2Trap(173) system.sysUpTime.0=9528 S:1.1.4.1.0=E:26866.1.1.11 E:26866.1.2.17="GigaVUE-OS" E:26866.1.2.1=3 E:26866.1.2.2="Fan Status Change" E:26866.1.2.19="1" E:26866.1.2.20=1 I more information is needed please do ask we are happy to provide or help. |
@neeles83 Can you open a new issue for INFORM support? |
@nasras03 Could you try out the v3 support we merged recently and let me know how it goes? It's available in the nightly builds. Thanks! |
Feature Request
We would like to be able to use SNMP traps version 3
Opening a feature request kicks off a discussion.
Proposal:
Can SNMP traps version 3 be implemented in a similar way to the existing v2c and v1 versions
Current behavior:
Only works for v1 and v2c
Desired behavior:
To work on v3
Use case:
We have > 3K devices and this split:
total no. Of v1 = 50
total no. Of v2c = 1285
total no. Of v3 = 1940
We are thinking of implementing the TICK stack and this feature is really important as allows
us to monitor most of our routers/switches in a secure way, as v3 provides username/password which v2 does not.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: