You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Context: Attempting to publish on crates.io the newest version of crate ibc, v0.1.1. We wanted to minimize the number of crates which go through this minor release, so decided not to bump the version ibc-proto and let this one sit at its current version 0.7.0.
Problem: Not possible to release ibc without bumping the version of crate ibc-proto. This is because both ibc and ibc-proto depend on tendermint-proto, which was updated to 0.18.1 in ibc.
The precise error is:
Attempting dry run of publishing crate ibc...
Updating crates.io index
Packaging ibc v0.1.1 (/Users/adi/Hammers/ibc-rs/modules)
Verifying ibc v0.1.1 (/Users/adi/Hammers/ibc-rs/modules)
error: failed to verify package tarball
Caused by:
failed to select a version for `tendermint-proto`.
... required by package `ibc-proto v0.7.0`
... which is depended on by `ibc v0.1.1 (/Users/adi/Hammers/ibc-rs/target/package/ibc-0.1.1)`
versions that meet the requirements `=0.18.0` are: 0.18.0
Consolidation of ibc-proto
The present issue raises a question: whether we shouldn't consider moving domain types and their implementation altogether into crate ibc-proto. This question may be tackled with https://github.com/informalsystems/ibc-rs/issues/425.
For Admin Use
Not duplicate issue
Appropriate labels applied
Appropriate milestone (priority) applied
Appropriate contributors tagged
Contributor assigned/self-assigned
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Crate
ibc-proto
Summary of Bug
Context: Attempting to publish on crates.io the newest version of crate
ibc
, v0.1.1. We wanted to minimize the number of crates which go through this minor release, so decided not to bump the versionibc-proto
and let this one sit at its current version0.7.0
.Problem: Not possible to release
ibc
without bumping the version of crateibc-proto
. This is because bothibc
andibc-proto
depend ontendermint-proto
, which was updated to0.18.1
inibc
.The precise error is:
Consolidation of ibc-proto
The present issue raises a question: whether we shouldn't consider moving domain types and their implementation altogether into crate
ibc-proto
. This question may be tackled with https://github.com/informalsystems/ibc-rs/issues/425.For Admin Use
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: