-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the observed contesters in Direct chain #1266
Conversation
Transactions CostsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
Cost of Init Transaction
Cost of Commit TransactionThis is using ada-only outputs for better comparability.
Cost of CollectCom Transaction
Cost of Close Transaction
Cost of Contest Transaction
Cost of Abort TransactionSome variation because of random mixture of still initial and already committed outputs.
Cost of FanOut TransactionInvolves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.
End-To-End Benchmark ResultsThis page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmarks results produced by Hydra's Continuous Integration system from the latest Please take those results with a grain of salt as they are currently produced from very limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Instead of focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, eg. how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes. Generated at 2024-03-21 15:55:11.135727945 UTC Baseline Scenario
Baseline Scenario
|
2a2f53f
to
3fb7f2f
Compare
Discussed in tactical today: We should fix this already (by rebasing and applying this fix), and add a follow-up 🔴 |
Stumbled over this when reviewing another observation function in the Hydra.Chain.Direct.Tx module. Obviously the ContestObservation and related types were assuming the included contesters to be the new list, but the code was looking at the "old datum". Did not find or write a test which would catch this (yet).
3fb7f2f
to
85a9b36
Compare
Follow up task to address the testing |
Stumbled over this when reviewing another observation function in the Hydra.Chain.Direct.Tx module and filed this PR as a "red bin" item.
Obviously the ContestObservation and related types were assuming the included contesters to be the new list, but the code was looking at the "old datum".
Did not find or write a test which would catch this (yet).