Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Snapcast: Discrepancy between muting in Iris vs. muting in Snapweb web client #612

Closed
tgurr opened this issue Sep 17, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Snapcast: Discrepancy between muting in Iris vs. muting in Snapweb web client #612

tgurr opened this issue Sep 17, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
bug confirmed A bug that has successfully been replicated and can be resolved

Comments

@tgurr
Copy link

tgurr commented Sep 17, 2020

Describe the bug
There seems to be a discrepancy between muting in Iris vs. muting in Snapweb web client

To Reproduce
Muting a Snapcast client in Iris
Screenshot_20200917_224751
results in:
Screenshot_20200917_224804

Muting a Snapcast client in Snapweb web client
Screenshot_20200917_224909
results in:
Screenshot_20200917_224859

Expected behavior
Having the same behaviour when muting no matter if using Iris or Snapcast client in Snapweb.

Environment details:

  • OS: Linux
  • Browser: Chromium
  • Iris version: 3.52.4
@tgurr tgurr added the bug label Sep 17, 2020
@tgurr tgurr changed the title Snapcast: discrepancy between muting in Iris vs. muting in Snapweb web client Snapcast: Discrepancy between muting in Iris vs. muting in Snapweb web client Sep 17, 2020
@jaedb jaedb added the confirmed A bug that has successfully been replicated and can be resolved label Sep 18, 2020
@cpegel
Copy link

cpegel commented Sep 23, 2020

I posted a related issue for snapweb.

@cpegel cpegel mentioned this issue Sep 23, 2020
Open
@jaedb
Copy link
Owner

jaedb commented Sep 30, 2020 •
edited
Loading

@tgurr can you confirm this occurs when using Snapdroid (or any other Snapcast ui) + Iris? If not, then the issue is likely to be related to the issue @rio- pointed out.

@jaedb jaedb closed this as completed in 555d7e7 Oct 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug confirmed A bug that has successfully been replicated and can be resolved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@tgurr @jaedb @cpegel