Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DynamoDB support #421

Closed
lapointexavier opened this issue Sep 22, 2017 · 11 comments
Closed

DynamoDB support #421

lapointexavier opened this issue Sep 22, 2017 · 11 comments

Comments

@lapointexavier
Copy link

I was looking at the deployment documentation and noticed that MySQL and ScyllaDB were next in the list of storage to support.

Is there something preventing the support of DynamoDB? Glancing at the queries made by the Cassandra plugin it seems like it would be possible to do, correct?

@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

Are you interested in creating and maintaining/supporting a DynamoDB storage backend plugin?

@lapointexavier
Copy link
Author

Yes that would interest me as I'm currently working on a Jaeger PoC at Percolate. We do use DDB heavily and that would be an attractive solution for us to stay within our stack. If it's doable, we may create a plugin and push it upstream if you like it.

I went through the contributing readme, it seems straight forward enough. Any recommendation about how to proceed?

@yurishkuro yurishkuro mentioned this issue Sep 22, 2017
8 tasks
@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

Besides the storage API implementation, we'll need plugin support, #422.

@lapointexavier
Copy link
Author

That make sense. That shouldn't prevent us from starting though, but we would need to re-adjust when plugin support is available. I realize you just created #422, but if it ends up being done, when would we realistically see plugin support (Q1, Q2, ..)?

@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

We could use your help with the plugin, especially since by then you'll have your implementation of the storage backend and can experiment with deploying it in the form of a plugin.

@otoolep
Copy link

otoolep commented Sep 27, 2017

cc @kevinbirch

@carlislk
Copy link

Any updates on this issue?

@jpkrohling
Copy link
Contributor

We are holding on adding further storage implementations until we have a plugin mechanism in place. You are more than welcome to help us sort that out and contribute with ideas and, why not, code :)

This is where the plugin mechanism is being discussed: #422

@jpkrohling jpkrohling added enhancement help wanted Features that maintainers are willing to accept but do not have cycles to implement area/storage labels Jun 29, 2018
@johanneswuerbach
Copy link
Contributor

I'm happy to present a first alpha release of the aws dynamodb storage plugin for jaeger https://github.com/johanneswuerbach/jaeger-dynamodb

There are still various optimisations missing, but it is passing all jaeger grpc storage plugin tests and I would be happy for any feedback.

@yurishkuro yurishkuro removed the help wanted Features that maintainers are willing to accept but do not have cycles to implement label Aug 26, 2022
@jkowall
Copy link
Contributor

jkowall commented Nov 4, 2022

Author has said this is no longer being worked on due to cost and it being a not so great solution : johanneswuerbach/jaeger-dynamodb#55

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants