You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, the paper says you have used 10-crop during evaluation. But it didn't appear in the code. In addition, I cannot reproduce the results on both office31 and visda:
For office31, I have tried 10-crop evalution and the result is 86.1. SAFN+ENT is 87.6 reported by the paper.
For visda, I have tried both 10-crop and your default eval code (which is not 10-crop), and the results are 69.8 and 71.7 respectively (resnet101 base), which is far from the result reported by the paper.
All the hyperparameters I have used are the defaults in the code. I have not tried imageCLEF. Hope you can help, thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, due to my recent plans, I don't have time and GPU to reproduce these experiments. However, you can send me an email and I would provide our 10-crop code for you. I hope that would be helpful.
Hi, the paper says you have used 10-crop during evaluation. But it didn't appear in the code. In addition, I cannot reproduce the results on both office31 and visda:
All the hyperparameters I have used are the defaults in the code. I have not tried imageCLEF. Hope you can help, thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: