Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uma beta reports our "apt configuration is corrupt" #462

Open
ripleymj opened this issue Jun 15, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Uma beta reports our "apt configuration is corrupt" #462

ripleymj opened this issue Jun 15, 2021 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@ripleymj
Copy link
Member

Uma beta reports our "apt configuration is corrupt" via tray icon. No further details are given yet. Possibly not even our problem to solve.

image

@ripleymj ripleymj added this to the Fall 2021 milestone Jun 15, 2021
@ripleymj
Copy link
Member Author

ripleymj commented Jun 17, 2021

On 2nd glance, mintupdate appears to die with the following error

-- Exception occurred in the refresh thread:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/linuxmint/mintUpdate/mintUpdate.py", line 830, in run
    self.application.builder.get_object("label_error_details").set_text(error_msg)
TypeError: Argument 1 does not allow None as a value

but the problem resolves itself after the first apt-get update is run manually.

Edit: it's the removal of /var/lib/apt/lists/ that triggers the problem, not the apt-get clean we run. Just removing the contents of lists/ also triggers the problem.

@ripleymj
Copy link
Member Author

Reported as linuxmint/mint20.2-beta#7

@ripleymj
Copy link
Member Author

With mintupdate 5.7.7, the crash no longer happens, but mintupdate still gets itself confused with the missing /var/lib/apt/lists/lock file. With the lock file in place but the lists missing, it still reports an error, but will eventually resolves itself once it resyncs package lists.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants