You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
GNU Emacs has a which-func-mode which provides a very similar feature set. breadcrumb.el differs in at least following aspects. But which-func could also benefit from all of these.
which-func only offers a global mode while breadcrumb offers both a global as well as a buffer-local mode.
breadcrumb also respects project information from project.el which which-func afaik does not.
Since you are core contributor to GNU Emacs, I suggest to contribute breadcrumb.el to Emacs itself, by moving all its (above mentioned, additional) features to which-func-mode. What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this isn't feasible, which-func-mode is much more complex and it'd be hell to make a backward-compatible version of it that provides the same features as breadcrumb.el
Since you are core contributor to GNU Emacs,
Anyone can be that. So you can try, but I don't think it'll be easy.
As to integrating breadcrumb.el into Emacs, it's another issue. I think it's too early for that (there's a policy in Emacs of not using shorthands and I'm not willing to give that up), but again, you can try.
GNU Emacs has a
which-func-mode
which provides a very similar feature set. breadcrumb.el differs in at least following aspects. But which-func could also benefit from all of these.Since you are core contributor to GNU Emacs, I suggest to contribute breadcrumb.el to Emacs itself, by moving all its (above mentioned, additional) features to which-func-mode. What do you think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: