Bad defsystem indentation

[dieggsy]

Sly now appears to indent defsystems like this:

(defsystem :slynk
    :serial t
  :components
  ...)

Instead of:

(defsystem :slynk
  :serial t
  :components
  ...)

Which aligns with Slime, ASDF documentation, and slynk's own defsystems.

[mdbergmann]

Hmm, it aligns as it should here.
Do you have an inferior lisp session open?

[dieggsy]

Oh. Interesting. I do have an inferior lisp session open. Maybe it's something about my configuration then? I thought I tested this in a plain environment, but I can double check.

[mdbergmann]

I do not know. I just observed and wanted to mention that without an inferior lisp session things like, i.e. &rest, &body are differently indented.

[dieggsy]

I do see this in a plain environment, with a sly connection started, but only under Allegro Common Lisp it seems. For example, it will happen with this minimal init:

;;; -*- lexical-binding: t -*-
(require 'package)
(add-to-list 'package-archives '("melpa" . "https://melpa.org/packages/") t)
(package-initialize)

;; This provides a nice configuration interface for installing and configuring
;; packages from your .emacs
(unless (package-installed-p 'use-package)
  (package-refresh-contents)
  (package-install 'use-package))

(use-package sly
  :ensure t
  :config
  ;; can change to your own path
  (setq inferior-lisp-program "alisp"))

But not when i set inferior-lisp-program to sbcl. Unless I C-u sly and start an alisp connection, at which point the indentation again goes bad (and doesn't seem to revert even if I switcch back to the sbcl connection).

[joaotavora]

In the beginning of a Lisp session, SLY and Swank exchange information about how how to indent certain macros. Maybe that communication isn't happening as it should when alisp is used. I'm sorry, I don't remember more details, but maybe this helps someone investigate.