Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider switching to caret's high correlation function #5

Open
bgreenwell opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Consider switching to caret's high correlation function #5

bgreenwell opened this issue Jul 10, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@bgreenwell
Copy link
Member

Consider using caret::findCorrelation for identifying which columns to remove. caret is already imported and would eliminate the need for importing qdapTools. Will need to check consistency and compare speed.
@bgreenwell bgreenwell assigned bgreenwell and unassigned bgreenwell Jul 10, 2017
@bgreenwell bgreenwell changed the title Compare with caret's high correlation function Consider switching to caret's high correlation function Jul 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@bgreenwell