-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
no-web server #147
Comments
We will address this in the near future. however, if you can contribute your solution, this would be much appreciated. |
Fair enough, i'll look into it. There's something else though: my enterprise is looking to start actively using KumuluzEE as MP runtime and i've already found some other stuff and/or bugs. I see there's little activity here, so do you guys hang out on some public collaboration platforms like Zulip or google groups? Our organization can't opt into Kumuluz enterprise support for certain reasons, so i'm looking for more informal collaboration :). |
You are very welcome to use KumuluzEE for production. Our framework has been used by several large companies (including energy, oil&gas, banking, insurance, automotive, etc.). You can submit bug reports here or use our email address. We'll make sure to provide solutions and fixes. |
But no online collaboration options outside paid support, correct? |
Github issues or email. No other online tool. Best regards. |
Move discussion to #150 |
It's not currently possible to create applications that don't use web/servlets, because the only @server implementation available is the one with Jetty. Spring-boot, Thorntail and others support running without a servlet container (completely omitting it from the final distribution) and so should Kumuluz. I created my own simple @server that just initializes
javax.enterprise.inject.se.SeContainer
and it actually works, so it shouldn't be a big deal to do so "officially".The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: