Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add resource parameterization for kube-rbac-proxy in stunner-gateway-operator-controller-manager deployment #49

Closed
towasz opened this issue Feb 6, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@towasz
Copy link

towasz commented Feb 6, 2025

Currently, the kube-rbac-proxy container in the stunner-gateway-operator-controller-manager deployment does not support resource parameterization. This makes difficult to adjust resource requests and limits based on cluster requirements.

It would be beneficial to allow standard resource parameterization, similar to how it is implemented in stunner-auth.

@towasz towasz changed the title Add Resource Parameterization for kube-rbac-proxy in stunner-gateway-operator-controller-manager Deployment Add resource parameterization for kube-rbac-proxy in stunner-gateway-operator-controller-manager deployment Feb 6, 2025
@levaitamas
Copy link
Member

Hey @towasz, thanks for pointing this out.
We are working on removing the unmaintained kube-rbac-proxy from our charts (see #48 and #47) both in the dev version and in the next stable release.
In the meantime, edit our charts locally by adding the missing resource configuration pieces.

@levaitamas levaitamas added enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on labels Feb 6, 2025
@rg0now rg0now closed this as completed Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants