Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is it really necessary to define the buff_size? #393

Closed
Tracked by #397
miguelriemoliveira opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
Tracked by #397

Is it really necessary to define the buff_size? #393

miguelriemoliveira opened this issue Apr 13, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@DanielCoelho112
Labels
discussion Issue for discussing a topic

Comments

@miguelriemoliveira
Copy link
Member 

                     buff_size=52428800)  # TODO Is it really necessary to define the buff_size?

atom/atom_calibration/scripts/dataset_playback

Line 250 in baff374

partial(selected_points_border_callback, selection=selection, dataset=dataset), queue_size=1,

@miguelriemoliveira miguelriemoliveira added the discussion Issue for discussing a topic label Apr 13, 2022
@miguelriemoliveira miguelriemoliveira mentioned this issue Apr 14, 2022
Closed
14 tasks
@DanielCoelho112
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @miguelriemoliveira,

I don't think so, I don't even remember why I did that. Maybe I copied it from somewhere in ATOM.

@miguelriemoliveira
Copy link
Member Author

ok, I'll fix it then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@DanielCoelho112 DanielCoelho112

Labels
discussion Issue for discussing a topic
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@miguelriemoliveira @DanielCoelho112