Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error when performing jump to definition #850

Open
tomekowal opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Error when performing jump to definition #850

tomekowal opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@tomekowal
Copy link

I am using Zed editor with lexical-v0.7.2 on elixir 1.16.3 and erlang 26.2.5

"Jump to definition" sometimes fails

{"error":{"code":-32603,"message":"** (FunctionClauseError) no function clause matching in LXical.RemoteControl.Api.code_actions/5
    (lx_remote_control 0.7.2) lib/lexical/remote_control/api.ex:42: LXical.RemoteControl.Api.code_actions(%{__struct__: LXical.Project, entropy: 49725, project_module: nil, mix_exs_uri: "file:///Users/tomaszkowal/bluecodecom/scheme-services/mix.exs", mix_project?: true, root_uri: "file:///Users/tomaszkowal/bluecodecom/scheme-services", env_variables: %{}, mix_env: nil, mix_target: nil}, #Inspect.Error<
  got UndefinedFunctionError with message:

      """
      function Code.Identifier.inspect_as_atom/1 is undefined or private
      """

  while inspecting:

      %{
        version: 0,
        path: "/Users/tomaszkowal/bluecodecom/scheme-services/apps/token_server/lib/token_server/consumer_scan/remote_processors.ex",
        uri: "file:///Users/tomaszkowal/bluecodecom/scheme-services/apps/token_server/lib/token_server/consumer_scan/remote_processors.ex",
        __struct__: LXical.Document,
        lines: %Lines<"defmodule TokenServer.ConsumerScan.RemoteProcessors do..."(107 lines)>,
        dirty?: false,
        language_id: "elixir"
      }

  Stacktrace:

    (elixir 1.16.3) Code.Identifier.inspect_as_atom(LXical.Document)
    (lx_lexical_shared 0.5.0) lib/lexical/document.ex:25: Inspect.LXical.Document.inspect/2
    (elixir 1.16.3) lib/inspect/algebra.ex:347: Inspect.Algebra.to_doc/2
    (elixir 1.16.3) lib/kernel.ex:2352: Kernel.inspect/2
    (elixir 1.16.3) lib/enum.ex:1700: Enum."-map/2-lists^map/1-1-"/2
    (elixir 1.16.3) lib/enum.ex:1700: Enum."-map/2-lists^map/1-1-"/2
    (elixir 1.16.3) lib/exception.ex:732: Exception.format_arity/1
    (elixir 1.16.3) lib/exception.ex:727: Exception.format_mfa/3

>, #Protocol.Types.Range<[start: #Protocol.Types.Position<[line: 10, character: 55]>, end: #Protocol.Types.Position<[line: 10, character: 55]>]>, [], [:quick_fix, :source_organize_imports])
    (lx_server 0.7.2) lib/lexical/server/provider/handlers/code_action.ex:16: LXical.Server.Provider.Handlers.CodeAction.handle/2
    (lx_server 0.7.2) lib/lexical/server/task_queue.ex:79: anonymous fn/4 in LXical.Server.TaskQueue.State.as_task/2
    (elixir 1.16.3) lib/task/supervised.ex:101: Task.Supervised.invoke_mfa/2
    (elixir 1.16.3) lib/task/supervised.ex:36: Task.Supervised.reply/4
"},"id":15}

The error is a little bit mysterious to me because I haven't found any references to inspect_as_atom neither in Elixir 1.6.3, nor in the lexical source code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant