You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It that seems having list expressions as first order citizens in LF as proposed by @oowekyala in #492 is likely to cause more issues than they would solve. For the time being, we can just escape lists in Rust initializers with {==}. In the long run, however, we should support lists (and also Python's dicts) directly in our syntax and treat them as lliterals. It is likely that all we'd need to do (in the grammar) is change the definition of Value
It that seems having list expressions as first order citizens in LF as proposed by @oowekyala in #492 is likely to cause more issues than they would solve. For the time being, we can just escape lists in Rust initializers with
{==}
. In the long run, however, we should support lists (and also Python's dicts) directly in our syntax and treat them as lliterals. It is likely that all we'd need to do (in the grammar) is change the definition ofValue
Originally posted by @lhstrh in #492 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: