This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
Volumes mounted as read-only, is this intentional? #34
Labels
question
Further information is requested
I was curious to see what sort of filesystem performance gains there were compared to Docker for Mac. I wanted to test a repo that would make a lot of filesystem writes, but in my tests I encountered an error saying the volume was mounted read-only. My apologies for my ignorance, but is this intentional? Should containers launched via lima with volumes be mounted as read-only volumes? For reference, here's how to reproduce:
This will eventually print the following error:
The docker analog that works ok:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: