Rename "fast" autolock.

[bleykauf]

I think "fast" autolock is not a really good description for end users since they won't most probably not notice a different in the time it takes for the lock to engage. Also, there are "fast" in and outputs: would be better not to reuse the name.

I think "simple" would be a better description. Any other ideas, @hermitdemschoenenleben ?

[bleykauf]

Or "FPGA" and "CPU" as it is indicated in the tests?

[hermitdemschoenenleben]

late-responding to the ping :D in the paper we used "Jitter tolerant autolock". Might be a good choice for the UI as well as a user doesn't care about the implementation details but wants to know what it does / why they should use it

[bleykauf]

@hermitdemschoenenleben: the jitter-tolerant is already called like this. It is slow since several spectra are recorded. It's the other mode that is called "fast mode". I guess "simple mode" is probably a better name. And then there is "fast mode" which is PID only as well..

[bleykauf]

Closed via #363.