Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 21, 2024. It is now read-only.

toki #16

Open
Th3Scribble opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 21 comments
Open

toki #16

Th3Scribble opened this issue Aug 15, 2023 · 21 comments

Comments

@Th3Scribble
Copy link
Collaborator

Th3Scribble commented Aug 15, 2023

(copying from the original toki post)

main ideas:

  • toki is communication
  • toki doesn't require an external recipient, so there should be examples that imply one and examples that don't

proposed definition:

communicate, speak, tell, ponder, discuss; language

the semicolon is to show that while all the definitions before it are forms of "communicate", "language" is an extension of that to "form of communication"
i didn't include any noun examples but i'm not sure what the best translation for that is, since i don't really have a word for that in english. where i would say "toki sina li pona" i would say "what you said is good", not something like "your speech is good". would "what is said" or "what one says" be a good inclusion?


toki

sona pu

VERB to communicate, say, speak, say, talk, use language, think

sona Linku pi toki Inli

communicate, say, speak, talk, use language, think; hello

sona Linku pi toki pona

toki la, jan li ken pana e sona kepeken kalama anu sitelen anu luka.

sona ku

communicate⁵, speak⁵, say⁵, conversation⁵, communication⁵, hello⁵, speech⁵, talk⁵, language⁵, tell⁵, statement⁵, hi⁵, discuss⁵, discussion⁵, discourse⁴, mention⁴, comment⁴, refer⁴, message⁴, express³, remark³, dialogue³, reporting³, call³, narrative³, contact³, respond³, commentary³, disclose³, proposal³, admit³, verbal³, tale³, story³, declare³, interview³, testify³, answer³, report³, expression³, phrase³, excuse², hey², response², reply², greet², confess², declaration², interaction², suggest², quote², state², preach², describe², negotiate², specify², claim², feedback², counsel², coverage², proposition², suggestion², accuse², consult²

sona sin

@gtbot2007
Copy link

conversation for a noun?

@gregdan3
Copy link
Member

personally I feel it's important that "think" in particular is included in the definition

something that was brought up in the original issue is that we should have both examples of to-self "communication" and not-to-self communication

the last proposed definition of toki was:

tell, speak, story, think, inform, speech, discuss, language, communicate, announcement, conversation

given how the rest of the word discussion has gone so far, and a bit of consideration for brevity and focus, i'm gonna propose:

tell, speak, story, think, inform, discuss, language, announcement, conversation; (interjection) hello

which gives us a good variety of verbs/nouns

i also added (interjection) hello which isn't necessary, and could be redone tons of ways. examples:

  • (sentence word) hello
  • (interjection) [greeting]
  • (sentence word) [greeting]
  • (interjection) hello, hi, good morning, ...

please iterate on this if y'all feel like this should be included! i'm unsure which is most clear but personally i lean toward the one i put in the def initially, or [greeting] after that

@lipamanka
Copy link
Collaborator

I agree about including think, definitely. I think because all words can be used as interjections including toki here contributes to an uneven and lexicalized approach to interjections, so I'd prefer it out, but it can stay in if someone feels strongly about it. it is in use and it is in pu.

@janPensa
Copy link
Collaborator

My first impression of "(interjection) hello" was leaning towards not including it, but on the other hand, knowing the greeting "toki!" is very useful to beginners, and that usage is not easily derived from the other meanings of the word.

But on the other other hand, most beginners would probably learn it quick enough from courses and other beginner-oriented resources.

@janPensa
Copy link
Collaborator

janPensa commented Aug 27, 2023

as for

tell, speak, story, think, inform, discuss, language, announcement, conversation

I feel like "inform" and "announcement" are slightly weak examples compared to the others. For some reason, I think "announce" is much more toki-like than "announcement", and "announce" is close to "inform", so we could merge those two into just "announce".

I also think "say" and "talk" are better, more common examples than "tell". And also far less likely to result in beginners making mistakes like "I told him" -> "mi toki e ona"

So I'd propose

say, speak, talk, think, announce, discuss, language, story, conversation

(And possibly "(interjection) hello" or similar at the end, depending on what people want)

@gregdan3
Copy link
Member

honestly, i'm very mixed on including the greeting, so here's my current breakdown:

reasons to include

  • toki greeting is in the current definition as "hello"
  • this is a use that is as widespread as it gets
  • it is an appropriate definition of the word
  • we have defined words specifically in the interjection position before
  • it's important for beginners to know
  • the definition search will show this to people immediately (this might be the most important thing to me on this list)

reasons to exclude

  • this is arguably a lexicalization, although if it is analyzed that way it's the Oldest one to the point of having faded into the background
  • there are other ways of saying hello, especially that have cropped up in the recent few months, and "hiding" the definition of hello from toki encourages these
  • it makes the whole definition shorter, giving us more room to expand the core definition of the word (note that this is more "comfort" length than any strict length limit we're dealing with)

hmm i had felt like ther were more reasons to exclude but there were not that i could think of


@janPensa

For some reason, I think "announce" is much more toki-like than "announcement", and "announce" is close to "inform", so we could merge those two into just "announce".

for me, "announcement" is closest to "conversation", being a noun representing some discrete kind of talking. given that, i think they're all appropriate. in fact i already took out the much more boring "communicate" with similar thinking, given its similarity to all the others already there

@KelseyHigham
Copy link
Collaborator

i'd kinda like "communicate" to be in there, to be inclusive of

  • forms of nonverbal communication, like body language (sijelo li toki e lete)
  • metaphorical uses, like a patch of grass growing greener over damp soil (kule kasi li toki e telo)

@KelseyHigham
Copy link
Collaborator

redundancies in my view:
say, speak
discuss, conversation
i like "say" because it takes a direct object in the same way as "toki", and i like "conversation" because it's a common noun usage.

i like jan Seli's suggestion (in the first post) to append "language" after a semicolon. either that or the pu system of saying "use language" as a verb.

@KelseyHigham
Copy link
Collaborator

i think "communicate" covers "inform" and "announce", too. so

communicate, say, think, conversation, story; language

@lipamanka
Copy link
Collaborator

why are we putting the semicolon in the middle of our noun examples?

1 similar comment
@lipamanka
Copy link
Collaborator

why are we putting the semicolon in the middle of our noun examples?

@KelseyHigham
Copy link
Collaborator

because every word here is an example of a communication except "language"

@lipamanka
Copy link
Collaborator

alright if that's what everyone else wants here

1 similar comment
@lipamanka
Copy link
Collaborator

alright if that's what everyone else wants here

@gregdan3
Copy link
Member

hmm, I don't get why language should be split with a semicolon

It's a different sense of the word toki, but we have been using semicolon to divide functions, not senses, right?

ko for example has no semicolons right now, because it covers adjectives and nouns that mesh into one idea; there's no transitive ko in that definition. this is in spite of the fact that while you can bundle everything in ko under "semi-solid" as we've done, to most English speakers ko comes across as centering around two fairly separate ideas: powders and goops.

as an even stronger example of this: I don't think any of us would agree that "laso" should be anything like "green, vermillion; blue, cyan"

so... why are we doing this to toki? or is there a reason this comparison doesn't apply?

@KelseyHigham
Copy link
Collaborator

KelseyHigham commented Aug 27, 2023

toki Tepo addressing this from the previous thread:

Really a language is a nasin toki and this is an example of the little known variant on tenpo dropping called nasin dropping la pilin mi la ona li wile lon poki ante.
#1 (comment)

@lipamanka
Copy link
Collaborator

also where did story come from? it might've come from me but if it did I forgot about that. do we need it? Also the nasin dropping thing is probably a joke, right? like that's not a thing that happens. right?

@KelseyHigham
Copy link
Collaborator

story is from toki Kekan ni: #1 (comment)

@KelseyHigham
Copy link
Collaborator

i like the inclusion of "story", it clarifies something i was confused about as a learner, but i'm okay with removing it

@KelseyHigham
Copy link
Collaborator

language la
i think it's reasonable to think of a language as a nasin of communication, an ilo of communication, or a ken of communication.

  • other ilos of communication, like walkie-talkies, aren't called toki.
  • other nasins of communication, like looking your conversation partner in the eyes, aren't called toki.
  • other kens of communication, like walking closer so you can hear each other, aren't called toki.

@lipamanka
Copy link
Collaborator

i would call conveying information through eye contact a type of toki personally. even though "nasin" means "method," toki can also mean "method of communication" as well as "instance of communication." but i do see how this makes the language aspect of toki a bit more separate, i just don't like the semicolon here.

re: story, 👍 thanks for the explain

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
No open projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants