Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What is the difference between correlation package and correlation native implementation #33

Open
NagabhushanSN95 opened this issue Apr 25, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@NagabhushanSN95
Copy link

I'm having issues using the correlation package. So, I was thinking of the native implementation you've provided. I would like to understand the differences between them.

  1. Is the difference just that one is implemented in c++ and the other in python, but both do the exact same things and are identical in performance?
  2. Is it just that the correlation package is faster than native implementation, but the accuracy will be the same?
  3. Or is it that the correlation package achieves better performance (both speed and accuracy) than the native implementation? If so, how wide is the gap?
@mxbi
Copy link

mxbi commented Nov 11, 2022

I would love to know this too @lliuz

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants