Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency in Standards used for Standard illuminants #97

Closed
NilesDavis opened this issue Aug 4, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Inconsistency in Standards used for Standard illuminants #97

NilesDavis opened this issue Aug 4, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@NilesDavis
Copy link
Contributor

I found that in the dataset for standard illuminants (reference_spectra.json) that 2 datasets are taken from other sources. So C, D50, D55 and D75 are taken from the CIE 015:2018 as they are in 5nm resolution as given in the standard. Standard illuminants A and D65 are in 1nm and exactly match the dataset from the ISO/CIE 11664-2:2020. What is the reason for this? Shouldn't the 5nm CIE15 data be the reference for all standard illuminants?

@spitschan
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for this detective work.

The underlying principle was to take the spectral power distribution in the smallest resolution available from official CIE documents. This boils down to the state of affairs you mention above. The exact sources are given in https://luox.app/about#illuminant-data.

I hope this clarifies things.

@NilesDavis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay this is the way you went. So to be consistent I would recommend to use the 1nm dataset from ISO/CIE 11664-2:2020 for D50 as well. Thanks for the quick exchange!

@spitschan
Copy link
Collaborator

At the time of writing, this document was not available unfortunately. Could you potentially create a pull request with this change? Thanks.

@spitschan
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you, much appreciated @NilesDavis.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants