You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, congratulations on the excellent work! The publication was highly engaging, and the results are very promising. I have a question about how DynamicBind processes ligands, specifically regarding its coarse-grained representation. Does this representation eliminate double or triple bonds?
I tried to run it on the test files (1qg8). While the input SMILES has double bonds, the output has only single bonds. This was confusing because the figures 3-5 in the publications show double bonds in the DynamicBind-predicted ligands. Could you please clarify what might be causing this issue?
Here's the command I ran: python run_single_protein_inference.py data/origin-1qg8.pdb data/1qg8_input.csv --header test ...
2D representation of input SMILES and output ligand opened on Schrodinger Maestro:
Output complex:
Thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, congratulations on the excellent work! The publication was highly engaging, and the results are very promising. I have a question about how DynamicBind processes ligands, specifically regarding its coarse-grained representation. Does this representation eliminate double or triple bonds?
I tried to run it on the test files (1qg8). While the input SMILES has double bonds, the output has only single bonds. This was confusing because the figures 3-5 in the publications show double bonds in the DynamicBind-predicted ligands. Could you please clarify what might be causing this issue?
Here's the command I ran:
python run_single_protein_inference.py data/origin-1qg8.pdb data/1qg8_input.csv --header test ...
2D representation of input SMILES and output ligand opened on Schrodinger Maestro:
Output complex:
Thanks for your help!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: