Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Liquefaction documentation #121

Closed
dharik13 opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Liquefaction documentation #121

dharik13 opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@dharik13
Copy link
Collaborator

Need to add documentation to describe new features related to liquefaction modeling

@dharik13 dharik13 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 18, 2023
@RuaridhMacd
Copy link
Collaborator

@Betristor @anna-nadia @dharik13

We need to revise the H2 documentation for clarity and to re-organize the indexes. We need to decide whether different resources need different indexes vs the same one.

For now, we're proposed to revise the indices to be :

  • g \in G : all hydrogen generators

  • k \in K , where K \sub G : liquefaction resources

  • @anna-nadia will propose an indexing rule and we can review next meeting.

@Betristor
Copy link
Collaborator

@anna-nadia I think it's necessary to distinguish the liquefaction plant with other plants like SMR if you regard them as a unique type generator.
From the viewpoint of regarding liquefaction as generators (in code), the production plant and compressor are bundled to be a single part, making it reseaonable to denote them with index g or k; but from the viewpoint of physical facts, liquefaction consumes electricity and gas hydrogen to make liquid hydrogen, where the essential part lies at the compressor. In balance a term $x_{t,z}^{Compressed}$ could be subtracted to fulfill it. With loss consideration, liquid hydrogen could be calculated based on this term, so is consumption of electricity.

@RuaridhMacd
Copy link
Collaborator

Resolved by PR #114

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants