Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Keep input and output in seperate and specific folders #94

Closed
Betristor opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 Discussed in #90 · 6 comments
Closed

Keep input and output in seperate and specific folders #94

Betristor opened this issue Nov 9, 2022 Discussed in #90 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
DOLPHYN UX DOLPHYN User Experience enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Betristor
Copy link
Collaborator

Discussed in #90

Originally posted by Betristor October 29, 2022
With the expansion of coupled energy sectors, the inputs files and output files are getting more and messy. To keep the inputs in seperate folders like power, hsc and csc could help identify which file is used in which sector. And by subfolders seperating them, we could have identical file names for inputs and even identical column names for specific data, which will bring convenience while adding new sectors. And to keep the output files in seperate folders will have same effect in saving our time developing new sectors.

@Betristor Betristor self-assigned this Nov 9, 2022
@Betristor Betristor added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 9, 2022
@Betristor
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@RuaridhMacd This feature and the ability to select zone from data will be the next two things I want to implement. Other features like change the name space may be left for nxet version. And the test examples could be put behind these two proposals in this issue and #96.

@RuaridhMacd
Copy link
Collaborator

@Betristor This sounds good. Let me know if you'd like to discuss it more.

@RuaridhMacd RuaridhMacd added the DOLPHYN UX DOLPHYN User Experience label Nov 10, 2022
@RuaridhMacd
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Let's implement a simple solution with just input folders for now
  • Test and check hard-coded input paths

@Betristor
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@RuaridhMacd I should implement this function after truck_index branch is merged. Changing this will cause some trouble for current users. I will upload an example case to guide users.

@RuaridhMacd
Copy link
Collaborator

@Betristor That sounds like a good plan. Thanks

@Betristor Betristor linked a pull request Jun 1, 2023 that will close this issue
@Betristor
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@RuaridhMacd This issue is a stale one and I will close it. Truck route index, zone selection and seperating inputs and outputs are three tasks identified for me to be solved. I reckon that truck route index is the most demanding one so I take that as propriety and leave this issue later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DOLPHYN UX DOLPHYN User Experience enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants