You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just updated to 0.29. I load a large number of points in a layer utilizing mbtiles on a server. I have a jet color scale implemented with the appropriate stops and utilize data-driven styles. With the latest 0.29 update, the stops for circle radius seem to have changed. Now, my circles look smaller than with the same stops in previous versions of gl js. Also, I am getting some points to randomly be colored in black. The stops for the circle-color property contain no black values (just from red to blue as per a jet color scale). Any ideas as to how to fix this? Did something change in 0.29 with how data driven styles are rendered?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
stackTom
changed the title
0.29 data driven styling
0.29 data driven styling changed rendering?
Dec 27, 2016
Thanks, I'm not sure how to install master as I am using simple script tags, but this seems like the issue. I can change my script tags to use 0.28, and it begins to work fine as usual.
Since I see the bug has been fixed, can I expect 0.30.0 to have these fixes included?
mapbox-gl-js version:
Steps to Trigger Behavior
Expected Behavior
Actual Behavior
I just updated to 0.29. I load a large number of points in a layer utilizing mbtiles on a server. I have a jet color scale implemented with the appropriate stops and utilize data-driven styles. With the latest 0.29 update, the stops for circle radius seem to have changed. Now, my circles look smaller than with the same stops in previous versions of gl js. Also, I am getting some points to randomly be colored in black. The stops for the circle-color property contain no black values (just from red to blue as per a jet color scale). Any ideas as to how to fix this? Did something change in 0.29 with how data driven styles are rendered?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: