-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Visitor Profile: order of visit numeration is confusing #8491
Comments
👍 |
I can confirm, I do see this as an issue as well (or at least confusing) |
It's not as trivial as we could change change it to 4, 3, 2, 1 but it might be wrong if there were eg 50 visits. Then it should be rather "Visit 50, 49, 48, 47, ...". There might be an issue if there were more than 100 visits since we apparently only fetch 100 visits. In this case we would possible show "Visit 100, visit 99, visit 98" which might be actually a higher visit. To be confirmed |
yes sure. 4,3,2,1 was only an example. Should take all "known" visits into account. Regarding only fetching 100 visits, one maybe can think of a two step approach:
in 1) one may show instead of numbering the visits for every shown visit "99+" |
There is actually a limit of 10 visits in the visitor profile. The limit selector is for the visitor log, not for the visitor profile. This means we'd need to fetch all visits initially to show a correct number which will be most likely slow. I tried to implement it but as soon as one clicks on the "load more" link it is a bit confusing even when showing I think the only solution will be to actually fetch the number of visits for a certain user. There is an index on |
A few users have reported this recently so increasing priority |
In the visitor profile you can see the visits of a visitor.
These visits are numbered from top to bottom.
Shouldn't it be from the logical pow the other way around,
so that the first visit has number 1 and every new visits gets the following number?
In addition beside the logic problem, the number of the visits in the past changes, so one could not talk about e.g. the visit with number 4 because when there is a new visit these number changes...
What do you think?
Please see attachment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: