Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handling column names directly: Part 2 #27

Open
mechatroner opened this issue Jan 1, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Handling column names directly: Part 2 #27

mechatroner opened this issue Jan 1, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@mechatroner
Copy link
Owner

mechatroner commented Jan 1, 2021

RBQL can now handle a.good_alphanumeric_column_name and a["arbitrary column name!"] notation (see #6 ).
But it would be great to go further and support direct column variables like name, surname, price etc without a and b prefixes.
It is not clear yet if it is possible at all to handle raw column names reliably and transparently. The most obvious problem is a potential conflict between column names and Python/JS identifiers, e.g. columns named class, if, sys, function, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant