Need a means of checking lib availability.

[benlesh]

I'm facing an issue with RxJS where we've moved to support AsyncIterable, but if a user compiles a project that uses RxJS with TypeScript and a lib that is less than ES2018, then the type inference is all messed up because AsyncIterable doesn't exist.

• Is there a way of enforcing a lib requirement on TS users of RxJS?
• Is there a way to check to see if AsyncIterable exists and "fallback" to other types?
• Is there a way to provide different types for different libs?

We have similar issues with trying to accurately type fromEvent, etc for both the DOM and Node.

Thanks for your time!

[benlesh]

cc @DanielRosenwasser @ahejlsberg ... you might have a quick answer for this one.

[RyanCavanaugh]

Is there a way of enforcing a lib requirement on TS users of RxJS?

It's not ideal, but you can write /// <reference lib="esnext.asynciterable" /> in your .d.ts to force that type definition to be in scope. The caveat is that this will surprise your users who set target: es5 because they'll start seeing ESNext types

[typescript-bot]

This issue has been marked as 'Question' and has seen no recent activity. It has been automatically closed for house-keeping purposes. If you're still waiting on a response, questions are usually better suited to stackoverflow.

[benlesh]

@RyanCavanaugh would we have to add that to the .d.ts manually?

It's definitely not ideal. Ideally we'd be able to change what we're doing based off of what lib they're using. This is a problem we have in other places too.

In RxJS, we can convert iterables, promises, async iterables, et al, to observables. If they don't support async iterables, ideally we wouldn't have that in the union type we're using. I guess I was looking for something like:

type ObservableInput<T> = Observable<T> | Promise<T> | Iterable<T> | (IsDefined<AsyncIterable> ? AsyncIterable<T> : never)

... or something. Haha. I have no idea how it would work. It seems like we can already do so much meta programming in the type system that it's almost possible.