You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been loosely following the vec_fallible_allocation RFC and saw you closed the RFC and published this crate.
I've previously encountered (but not used) the fallible_collections crate.
Would it be possible to add a section to the Readme comparing this crate with the fallible_collections crate (well, probably only the Vec portion of it). The exposed API seems to be quite similar, so I'm wondering what the main differences are.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Great idea!
I'll change the readme with more details, but to summarize: this crate is specifically designed for situations where #[cfg(no_global_oom_handling)] is enabled: other crates like fallible_collections won't work in those environments as they call methods like push in their implementations, which don't exist when that cfg is enabled.
Hi,
I've been loosely following the
vec_fallible_allocation
RFC and saw you closed the RFC and published this crate.I've previously encountered (but not used) the fallible_collections crate.
Would it be possible to add a section to the Readme comparing this crate with the fallible_collections crate (well, probably only the
Vec
portion of it). The exposed API seems to be quite similar, so I'm wondering what the main differences are.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: