Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feat] C# o1 preview parity #2103

Closed
corinagum opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2111
Closed

[Feat] C# o1 preview parity #2103

corinagum opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #2111
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@corinagum
Copy link
Collaborator

Language

C#

Version

latest

Description

This is a test

Reproduction Steps

...

@corinagum corinagum added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 10, 2024
singhk97 added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 17, 2024
## Linked issues

closes: #2103 

## Details
Added support for `o1-preview` and `o1-mini` models.

* Bumped `OpenAI` and `Azure.AI.OpenAI` to `2.1.0-beta.1`.
* Tested o1 support with light bot sample with monologue augmentation.
* Updated `teamsChefBot-streaming` to use deployed `Microsoft.Teams.AI`
nuget package.
* Fixed `LayoutSection` bug with incorrect ordering of sections.

## Attestation Checklist

- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project

- I have checked for/fixed spelling, linting, and other errors
- I have commented my code for clarity
- I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (updating the
doc strings in the code is sufficient)
- My changes generate no new warnings
- I have added tests that validates my changes, and provides sufficient
test coverage. I have tested with:
  - Local testing
  - E2E testing in Teams
- New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants