-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 199
Publish a 2nd recommended ruleset that contains *only* the contrib rules #309
Comments
An alternative to this would be to strip out all rules not residing in this project from the Or, if you'd prefer to keep one living in this project for the project's own consumption, I suppose you could maintain two Users who |
@dsifford have you tried using our "releases" branch? It is the latest compiled code. Does that fix the issue I'm not sure how having the source code in the /dist dir solves your problem. (sorry, I thought I'd replied to this earlier). |
@HamletDRC No worries. No, the releases branch did not work for me. I'm using the nightly branch of tslint and that was not cooperating with the fact that if I I think the main issue is that this repo creates a circumstance that results in an "extends cascade". In other words, if I extend this repo, I'm also extending all the repos that you extend (or, in this case, the rules from tslint proper that you have set in your The only way that this type of thing can be fixed is if lint rule repos (such as this one) maintains two I ended up just removing the extends rule for this repo from my project for now until your tslint.json is free of the (I hope that makes sense. It's admittedly a bit confusing). |
@dsifford so your problem would be solved if we published a 2nd tslint.json that only contained our rules, right? |
Correct |
💀 It's time! 💀TSLint is deprecated and no longer accepting pull requests other than security fixes. See #876. ☠️ 👋 It was a pleasure open sourcing with you! |
Hello there,
I'm in a situation I'd like to be able to pull and use the bleeding edge code from the master branch (specifically, because in
2.0.13
, still havingno-duplicate-key
set to true is breaking my build).Would this be possible?
Thanks so much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: